Attraction to Chaos
On confusing intensity with depth, danger with courage, and disorder with something interesting.
@aaronretamero · Jun 13, 2026
7 min read · 2 views
There’s a kind of chaos many people mistake for depth.
I’m not talking about the real chaos of life, the kind that shows up uninvited: family problems, hard seasons, uncertainty, pain, exhaustion, changes no one controls. That’s part of existing. Nobody lives on a clean line.
I’m talking about another chaos.
Chaos turned into an aesthetic.
People who seem more interesting because they’re unpredictable. Relationships that feel more intense because you never quite know where you stand. People who mistake irresponsibility for freedom. Stories told as if danger, lack of control, or emotional mess were signs of a more authentic life.
And I get why it hooks you.
Calm, when you’re not used to it, can feel boring. Coherence can feel flat. Stability can feel like it lacks mystery. A person who doesn’t play games with you, who doesn’t disappear to create anxiety, who doesn’t make you jealous, who doesn’t turn every conversation into a little power test, can seem less intense than someone who keeps you on edge.
But not everything that unsettles you has depth.
Sometimes it only knew how to break your calm.
That’s the dangerous thing about chaos: it creates a sense of meaning. It forces you to look. It forces you to react. It pulls you out of your center. It makes you overthink. It generates questions, hypotheses, insecurity, desire, a need to understand. And because it takes up so much mental space, you can end up confusing presence with importance.
But something occupying your head doesn’t mean it deserves to be there.
There are people who attract you not because they’re deep, but because they’re inconsistent. Because you don’t know what to expect. Because one day they give you a sign and the next day they take it away. Because they seem to open a door and then act like it never existed. Because they leave you with a doubt your mind tries to solve.
And if your mind looks for patterns, that can hook you more than it should.
Not because there’s love. Not because there’s real connection. Not because there’s some huge hidden truth.
But because there’s a lack of closure.
And lack of closure is addictive to a mind that needs to understand.
Sometimes we call mystery what is simply ambiguity. We call intensity what is instability. We call chemistry what is well-managed anxiety. We call depth what, if you look at it calmly, was only a person generating tension without offering much behind it.
Chaos has a huge social advantage: it looks alive.
It seems more real than calm. More cinematic. More desirable. More worth telling. A steady person rarely presents as an intense story. A chaotic person, on the other hand, almost always brings plot. There are rises, falls, contradictions, odd lines, ambiguous signals, reconciliations, disappearances, moments of euphoria and moments of confusion.
And of course, from the outside it looks like something is happening.
But sometimes nothing deep is happening.
There’s just a lot of noise.
I think our times have romanticized disorder too much. Having character gets confused with being difficult. Having an inner world gets confused with being emotionally unpredictable. Being free gets confused with not measuring consequences. Being intense gets confused with not being able to self-regulate. Being interesting gets confused with always living on the edge.
And no.
Sometimes a person isn’t deep: they’re just unstable. Sometimes a person isn’t free: they’re just irresponsible. Sometimes a person isn’t mysterious: they just don’t know how to communicate clearly. Sometimes a person isn’t intense: they just need constant attention. Sometimes a person doesn’t have an interesting life: they just live surrounded by problems they themselves feed.
The problem is that chaos can seem attractive when you haven’t yet paid its price.
From afar, it looks like energy. Up close, it’s often wear.
From afar, it looks like a story. Up close, it’s often repetition.
From afar, it looks like intensity. Up close, it’s often a huge lack of peace.
And maybe that’s why so many people get hooked on people who aren’t good for them. Because they’re not really seeking well-being; they’re seeking stimulus. They want to feel something strong, even if it’s anxiety. They want a signal, even if it’s confusing. They want an emotion that pulls them out of emptiness, even if it leaves them worse off.
Calm requires a different relationship with yourself.
Because when someone doesn’t unsettle you, an awkward question appears: do I like this person, or do I just like what they activate in me?
And often the answer isn’t pretty.
There are people who don’t miss a person. They miss the emotional high. The unexpected message. The tension. The reconciliation. The doubt. The feeling of being inside something that seems important because it doesn’t let you sleep.
But not everything that keeps you awake deserves your life.
There’s a huge difference between a relationship that wakes you up and a relationship that dysregulates you.
A relationship that wakes you up expands you. It makes you think better. It gives you the desire to build, to be clearer, to care, to look at the world with more depth. It can have intensity, of course, but it doesn’t destroy you from within. It doesn’t need to break your calm to prove it exists.
A relationship that dysregulates you, on the other hand, makes you dependent on the next stimulus. It has you waiting for signals. It makes you overanalyze. It takes away your center. It turns you into someone who waits for crumbs of clarity while trying to justify a pattern you’ve already seen.
And that’s where judgment has to show up.
Because attraction isn’t always a reliable compass. Sometimes it only points to a wound, a habit, a fantasy, or a part of you that still confuses uncertainty with value.
This doesn’t mean you should look for a flat life, without tension, desire, or mystery. I don’t want that. A life without intensity doesn’t interest me much either. There is healthy intensity: that of a real conversation, a deep connection, a mind that challenges you, a presence that moves something inside you, a person who doesn’t need to play to be interesting.
That intensity exists.
But it doesn’t need chaos to hold.
It doesn’t need jealousy. It doesn’t need danger. It doesn’t need irresponsibility. It doesn’t need constant ambiguity. It doesn’t need to make you feel like you have to earn every moment of attention.
Real depth is usually much quieter.
It doesn’t always arrive like a roller coaster. Sometimes it comes like a strange calm. Like a conversation where you don’t have to interpret every line. Like someone with their own position. Like a person who doesn’t need to seem difficult to be valuable. Like a presence that doesn’t require you to be in analysis mode all the time.
And that, when you come from a lot of noise, can seem like little.
But maybe it isn’t little.
Maybe it’s peace.
The hard part is that peace doesn’t always deliver the same hit as chaos. It doesn’t have the same immediate shine. It doesn’t produce the same urgency. It doesn’t make you check your phone. It doesn’t keep you waiting for a sign. It doesn’t give you that false feeling of being inside something enormous.
Peace doesn’t hook quickly.
But it holds better.
And I think maturing is also learning to tell what attracts you from what’s good to keep near. What stimulates you from what builds you. What moves you from what just knows how to push buttons. A person with depth from a person with enough disorder to seem deep.
Because some people turn their chaos into identity.
And that can be magnetic for a while. There’s something seductive about someone who seems to live outside the rules, about someone who can’t be fully read, about someone who seems to have a life more intense than others. But if you look closer, sometimes there’s no freedom. There’s a lack of responsibility. There’s no mystery. There’s inconsistency. There’s no depth. There’s an inability to be calm without needing to provoke something.
And I don’t want to romanticize that.
I don’t want to call interesting what actually wears me down. I don’t want to confuse an internal alarm with desire. I don’t want to think someone has depth just because they force me to decipher them. I don’t want to give depth to someone just because they know how to generate tension.
I want to be able to admire something harder than chaos: coherence.
People who have judgment. People who don’t need to keep acting. People who can be intense without being destructive. People who can have darkness without turning it into a spectacle. People who have lived hard things, but don’t use that as an excuse to break other people’s calm.
Because having suffered doesn’t automatically make you deep.
Sometimes it makes you more aware. Sometimes it makes you more sensitive. Sometimes it makes you more human.
But other times it just makes you more chaotic if you never order anything that happened to you.
And there lies the difference.
Depth isn’t having shadows.
Depth is what you do with them.
I’m not interested in perfect people. They don’t exist. I’m not interested in a life without contradictions either. I have mine. Sometimes I overthink, demand too much, interpret too much, need too much meaning in things that maybe don’t have it. I’m not writing this from a clean place.
But precisely because of that I know chaos doesn’t always deserve an altar.
There’s a part of me that can be drawn to the complex, the intense, the hard-to-explain. But I have less patience for disorder that dresses up as depth. For people who need tension to seem interesting. For dynamics that only work if someone is insecure. For stories that seem strong because they don’t know how to be at peace.
Not everything that generates intensity has value.
Not everything that unsettles you matters.
Not everything that looks like a story deserves to become one.
Sometimes the smartest move is losing interest in time.
Not out of coldness. Not out of superiority. Not because the other person is worthless.
But because your peace begins to have better judgment than your curiosity.
And when that happens, chaos loses part of its charm.
It stops looking like mystery.
It starts to look like exhaustion.